Ontology Explained

All videosIf Anyone Analyzes It... Everyone Dies

Yudkowsky and Soares Needed an Editor | Chapter 4, Part 2 of If Anyone Builds It

Released , 33 min

Play Yudkowsky and Soares Needed an Editor | Chapter 4, Part 2 of If Anyone Builds It on YouTube

What if an AI develops preferences that are very different from what we intended?

In Part 2 of my discussion of Chapter 4 of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares imagine a series of increasingly strange ways an AI might come to "want" things that its creators never intended.

And I have some problems with these scenarios.

The chapter's central point is that we shouldn't assume an AI will simply want whatever we trained it to want. I agree with that. But the authors move from this relatively modest claim to much stronger claims about AI preferences being bizarre, unpredictable, and almost certainly catastrophically misaligned with human interests.

I don't think the arguments they give justify that leap.

In this video, I go through their five scenarios, including the strange "SolidGoldMagikarp" case, and ask what these thought experiments actually establish. I argue that the scenarios systematically ignore benign possibilities, make unsupported claims about how likely different outcomes are, and often don't explain how the more extreme outcomes would actually arise.

Then we get to the chapter's final sections: Yudkowsky and Soares explicitly admit that their scenarios aren't predictions and that they don't know whether an LLM-based AI could even develop these sorts of preferences. But they nevertheless conclude that mature AI preferences will be "vanishingly unlikely" to align with ours.

That's where I think the argument really breaks down.

The distinction I keep coming back to throughout the video is simple:

AI might surprise us.

That does not by itself show that AI will develop preferences that are catastrophically opposed to human interests.

I finish by looking at their treatment of the Alignment Problem and arguing that the chapter's most important conclusion receives surprisingly little actual argument.

This is Part 2 of my discussion of Chapter 4, "You Don't Get What You Train For," from If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares.

If Anyone Analyzes It... Everyone Dies

Part 6 of 9 in this series.

  1. An Honest Breakdown of Eliezer Yudkowsky's AI Doom Book19:56
  2. The Case for Superintelligence Is Surprisingly Thin | If Anyone Builds It... Chapter 136:43
  3. Are AIs "Grown" or Built? Analyzing Chapter 2 of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies44:15
  4. Does AI Really Want Anything? | If Anyone Builds It... Chapter 328:32
  5. Can We Predict What AI Will Want? | Yudkowsky & Soares Chapter 4 Part 130:39
  6. Yudkowsky and Soares Needed an Editor | Chapter 4, Part 2 of If Anyone Builds It33:23
  7. Will Superintelligent AI Want to Kill Us? | Chapter 538:27
  8. Can Humanity Conquer a Rogue ASI? | Chapter 626:40
  9. What If AI Actually Tried to Kill Us? | Section II of If Anyone Builds It...39:03

Next in the series: Will Superintelligent AI Want to Kill Us? | Chapter 5

Sources